They what?
Aug. 29th, 2007 10:03 pmHad the welcome-and-introduction at new work this afternoon; the real thing starts at 9am tomorrow. Probably more on that anon, but during the tour I asked something about the surrounding buildings and our guide mentioned that they are now protected by heritage listing as a 'classical example of Brutalist architecture.' Er, WTF?
As anybody who's lived in Canberra knows (although they might not have encountered the name), Brutalist is one of the ugliest styles imaginable. The basic idea is "big, blocky, unpainted grey concrete and LOTS OF IT". (Here's a flattering photo of the High Court with a lot of sunlight on it; in the flesh it looks far, far drabber.) But my personal tastes aside, the idea that Brutalism needs preservation is ludicrous. Half the public buildings in Canberra were built back when it was the trendy new thing; High Court, Art Gallery, School of Music, and a crapload of government offices are all built that way, eyesores in what's otherwise a very pretty city IMHO.
In fact, my workplace-to-be is one of the few buildings in that area that aren't Brutalist (thank goodness!)
As anybody who's lived in Canberra knows (although they might not have encountered the name), Brutalist is one of the ugliest styles imaginable. The basic idea is "big, blocky, unpainted grey concrete and LOTS OF IT". (Here's a flattering photo of the High Court with a lot of sunlight on it; in the flesh it looks far, far drabber.) But my personal tastes aside, the idea that Brutalism needs preservation is ludicrous. Half the public buildings in Canberra were built back when it was the trendy new thing; High Court, Art Gallery, School of Music, and a crapload of government offices are all built that way, eyesores in what's otherwise a very pretty city IMHO.
In fact, my workplace-to-be is one of the few buildings in that area that aren't Brutalist (thank goodness!)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-29 12:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-29 03:03 pm (UTC)I personally think there's some lovely Brutalist stuff. Incredibly powerful, done right.
It's just that none of it's in Canberra. The Brutalism in Canberra is second-rate, uninspired, not even a good copy.
Habitat 67 in Montreal has its moments, but I'd be all for preserving this baby in its own right. Or this.
But yeah. The Canberra stuff is just bad. Though the School of Music isn't a complete writeoff.
I think, for me, the aesthetic is actually far more appealing than the reality - having grown up around it, it's cold, wet and smelly. Which may also be coloring
jai.
.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-30 08:51 am (UTC)Its roof, OTOH... I'd have thought that something with that much concrete in it could've survived a hailstorm better than the buildings around it, but apparently the blocky-ness didn't extend to the bits that mattered.
I'm not sure I really like those two photos - I'd have to see the buildings for myself to judge - but they're certainly a sight better than Canberra's. Some evidence there of creative thought beyond "let's use a crapload of cement and no paint".
no subject
Date: 2007-08-30 08:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-29 06:50 pm (UTC)(the big concrete boxes, we hates them, they are ugly... fortunately most of "here" was built long before that became fashionable, so I don't have to look at it much.)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-29 08:01 pm (UTC)I'm with the eyesore camp myself. Sometimes when you're trying new things that have never been done before, it's important to remember that there's a reason why some things have never been done before.
I suppose we could keep one or two. So long as they aren't anywhere near me.
I have no taste
Date: 2007-08-30 09:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-31 05:21 pm (UTC)