Before you criticise "50 Shades of Grey" for being a badly-written unrealistic book that presents an unhealthy relationship model, think about two questions:
(1) Did you criticise "Twilight" for the exact same failings?
(2) Bearing in mind that "Twilight" is aimed at a younger audience who have a higher risk of taking the relationship aspects as a how-to instead of escapist fantasy... if you answered "no" to #1 above, please explain the difference.
I don't plan to read 50SoG. I'm quite willing to take everybody's word for it that it's dull and unrealistic and not a good model for dating. But there are THOUSANDS of books released every year that fit those descriptors, many of them quite successful, and rarely do they cop a backlash like this one. ("Twilight" caught some, but nowhere near this level.)
So while I agree with the criticisms offered, I have to wonder if that's really what's driving the reaction. Would we be seeing this same level of hostility if EL James had written the exact same book, without the kinky sex, as a best-selling romance novel?
(1) Did you criticise "Twilight" for the exact same failings?
(2) Bearing in mind that "Twilight" is aimed at a younger audience who have a higher risk of taking the relationship aspects as a how-to instead of escapist fantasy... if you answered "no" to #1 above, please explain the difference.
I don't plan to read 50SoG. I'm quite willing to take everybody's word for it that it's dull and unrealistic and not a good model for dating. But there are THOUSANDS of books released every year that fit those descriptors, many of them quite successful, and rarely do they cop a backlash like this one. ("Twilight" caught some, but nowhere near this level.)
So while I agree with the criticisms offered, I have to wonder if that's really what's driving the reaction. Would we be seeing this same level of hostility if EL James had written the exact same book, without the kinky sex, as a best-selling romance novel?