Bwahaha!

[lederhosen]

I suspect most conservatives will cringe just as much as I did at Conservapedia. I thought at first it might have been parody - the article on the theory of relativity verges on hilarity in its wrongness - but I suspect it's for real.

A commenter at pharyngula notes that the domain is registered to one "Andrew Schlafly", a surname that should be familiar to some of y'all.

Comments

[lokicarbis.livejournal.com]

Wikipedia is still more fun!

[lederhosen.livejournal.com]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_problems_solved_by_MacGyver

[lokicarbis.livejournal.com]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_List_%28My_Name_Is_Earl%29

[amberdine.livejournal.com]

Oh oh oh oh oh. Ugh. I'm not going to look!

*shudder*


*cry*

[winterkoninkje.livejournal.com]

Oh come now, you don't need all that SAN. Surely you can sacrifice some for greater enlightenment. And besides, you might be able to make your check.

[lederhosen.livejournal.com]

http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia_Logo

In particular:

http://www.conservapedia.com/Image:Conservapidialogo01.JPG
http://www.conservapedia.com/images/3/39/ConservapediaLogo.gif

[winterkoninkje.livejournal.com]

Yeek! ia, ia!

[tcpip.livejournal.com]

Oh, I so hope that doesn't get edited in the near future.

[lederhosen.livejournal.com]

Even if it does, it'll be in the article history unless an admin goes out of their way to delete records of the edit...

[lederhosen.livejournal.com]

Also, http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=Aschlafly would probably turn up something entertaining, although I don't have time to check it now...

[mr-figgy.livejournal.com]

"Later experiments proved that space is flat overall."

[jazzmasterson.livejournal.com]

Slashdotted. :(

[lederhosen.livejournal.com]

Looks like somebody's tried to fix it since, but quoting from this version:

"Unlike most advances in physics, the theory of relativity was proposed based on mathematical theory rather than observation. The theory rests on two postulates that are difficult to test, and then derives mathematically what the physical consequences should be. Those two postulates are that the speed of light never changes, and that all laws of physics are the same in every (inertial) frame of reference no matter where it is or how fast it is traveling. This theory rejects Isaac Newton's God-given theory of gravitation and replaces it with a concept that there is a continuum of space and time, and that large masses (like the sun) bend space in a manner similar to how a finger can depress an area of a balloon. From this proposed bending of space the expression arose that "space is curved." But experiments later proved that space is flat overall.

Nothing useful has even been built based on the theory of relativity. Scientists claim that this is because relativity only applies to extremely heavy or fast objects and rely on future scientists to finally come up with the proof that will vindicate their life's work. Most conservatives are skeptical since science is supposed to be about finding proof before a theory becomes a fact, not after. Albert Einstein's work had nothing to do with the development of the atomic bomb, contrary to popular opinion. Only one Nobel Prize has ever been given (in 1993) that relates to relativity, and the validity of that particular award is questionable. Many things predicted by the theory of relativity, such as gravitons, have never been found despite much searching for them. Many observed phenomenon, such as the bending of light passing near the sun or the advance of the perihelion in the orbit of Mercury, can be also predicted by Newton's theory..."

And then it wanders into how relativism is used to pimp moral relativism, yada yada.

[ambitious-wench.livejournal.com]

Oh. My. God. He's the son of Phyllis Schlafly.

Head>wall. Repeat.

[lederhosen.livejournal.com]

Yup, and it looks like this is run out of Eagle Forum University; Eagle Forum is Phyllis' little den of zealotry.