A Little Knowledge Is A Dangerous Thing
Aug. 20th, 2011 12:13 pmParaphrase of two recent comments I've seen:
"The UK National Blood Service are asking for donations of O, A, and AB [but not B]. Ha ha, if they'd paid attention in high school biology they'd know that ABs are universal recipients, so they can use B just as well as AB."
"Census has a free-text field for listing your occupation. Anybody who's done a first-year survey design course knows that free-text questions are useless for quantitative analysis."
And so on. People who work in $FIELD for a living do something that looks stupid to a layman with even the smallest shred of knowledge about how $FIELD works, and mockery ensues.
Now, I'm the last person to say that you should assume competence; people who should know better quite often DO get stuff wrong in their own field. But it's also a bad idea to assume incompetence. Very often, including both the examples above, the commenter's limited understanding of $FIELD is wrong and the "experts" really do know their job.
So, usually a good idea to check the facts quietly first before going all Nelson Muntz on somebody who's quite likely to be right.
"The UK National Blood Service are asking for donations of O, A, and AB [but not B]. Ha ha, if they'd paid attention in high school biology they'd know that ABs are universal recipients, so they can use B just as well as AB."
"Census has a free-text field for listing your occupation. Anybody who's done a first-year survey design course knows that free-text questions are useless for quantitative analysis."
And so on. People who work in $FIELD for a living do something that looks stupid to a layman with even the smallest shred of knowledge about how $FIELD works, and mockery ensues.
Now, I'm the last person to say that you should assume competence; people who should know better quite often DO get stuff wrong in their own field. But it's also a bad idea to assume incompetence. Very often, including both the examples above, the commenter's limited understanding of $FIELD is wrong and the "experts" really do know their job.
So, usually a good idea to check the facts quietly first before going all Nelson Muntz on somebody who's quite likely to be right.