May. 4th, 2007

Bikes!

May. 4th, 2007 12:24 am
lederhosen: (Default)
I've been meaning to post about this one for a while...

When I was a teenager, I worked as an 'Explainer' at Questacon. One of the science demos I was trained to do was a bit on gyroscopic precession: if you take a bicycle wheel, spin it, and then try to tilt its axis while it's spinning, it will pull around. And we were taught (and duly taught our visitors) that Gyroscopic Precession Is What Keeps Bicycles From Falling Over. It seemed sensible enough - after all, it's much harder to balance a bike when standing still than when it's moving and the wheels are spinning. And gyroscopic effects are what stabilises a number of other things - spinning tops, for instance. Indeed, if you detach a wheel from your bike and roll it downhill on its own, gyroscopic effects due to its rotation are what keeps it upright instead of falling over on its side.

Many, many reputable physicists tell us that it's the same thing with a bicycle, or a motorbike. Straight Dope, for instance, repeats the claim. But it's hard to argue with this:


http://www.losethetrainingwheels.org/default.aspx?Lev=2&ID=34

This wonder, created by Dr. Richard Klein of UIUC, is a zero-gyroscopic bike. The two airborne wheels are in contact with the two on the ground, so they rotate at the same speed but in opposite directions, cancelling out any gyroscopic effects. Despite this, the bike is still quite easy to ride. Before Klein, English researcher David Jones had published similar findings, and his article on his fruitless attempts to build an unrideable bike is quite entertainingly written.

So why do bikes stay upright? Wikipedia has a more detailed discussion, but it comes down to forward movement. When your bike starts to fall over to the left, steering slightly to the left brings the base of the wheels back under the center of gravity, restoring stability. Most bikes will steer into the direction of the tilt even without the rider's intervention or gyroscopic effects, due to their 'trail'; you can test this for yourself by tilting a stationary bike. But as the first link above discusses, even bikes with zero trail can be ridden quite easily as long as you keep your hands on the handlebars; hands-off, you can balance with the aid of precession, but it's not nearly as easy as balancing hands-on without precession.
lederhosen: (Default)
Via Pharyngula: Time magazine is treating the world to yet another "100 most important people" list, because apparently there aren't enough of those already. One of those to make the list, in the science category, is Richard Dawkins. So who did they find to write Dawkins' profile for the article?

Michael Behe.

For those of you who don't recognise that name - count yourself lucky - this is sort of like hiring Fidel Castro to profile John F. Kennedy, except that AFAIK neither Dawkins nor Behe have actually tried to have one another killed.

Profile

lederhosen: (Default)
lederhosen

July 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
2324252627 2829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 6th, 2025 08:14 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios