ext_294156 ([identity profile] nefaria.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] lederhosen 2009-02-08 04:55 pm (UTC)

It was a logical argument on my part: the fact that an invalid proof of X exists does not imply that X is false.

And no, I am not a part of this problem, I have nothing to do with it.
(20 comments)

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.