ext_130278 ([identity profile] drzero.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] lederhosen 2004-05-11 08:57 pm (UTC)

You need not apologise for posting so much!

As for the alternate female references, I counted the following...

I could exclude 19 because they referred to fantasy creatures. (Of which 6 were not necessarily female anyway)

20 were comments on their social or sexual status (all of which I would consider chauvinistically ill-advised)

9 could be excused unless the woman in question actually bore said title. (In which case the proper form of address would be "Her Majesty/Grace/Honor", etc.)

5 were occupations. Only good if they were so engaged.

9 were simply variants on 'she' or 'female' in varying languages. That's cheating.

5 are comparisons to animals, or precious materials. Not so good.

According to the online Merriam-Webster dictionary, 6 aren't actually words.

That leaves us with female, or figurine, and calling someone an inanimate object is insulting. :)

(BTW, is it just me, or does 'Femorette' sound like a member of a forgettable '60s girl band?)

Heh, true. Sounds to me like a patch one applies just after breaking up with someone to help 'kick the habit'. It beats chewing gum after all.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org